Key Differences
In short — Alienware m16 R2 outperforms the cheaper acer Predator Triton 300 SE 14"" WUXGA 165Hz on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing acer Predator Triton 300 SE 14"" WUXGA 165Hz is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Alienware m16 R2 Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 18% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than acer Predator Triton 300 SE 14"" WUXGA 165Hz - 77 vs 65 FPS
Advantages of acer Predator Triton 300 SE 14"" WUXGA 165Hz Gaming Laptop
- Up to 46% cheaper than Alienware m16 R2 - $1149.0 vs $2129.99
- Up to 36% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Alienware m16 R2 - $17.68 vs $27.66 per FPS
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $2,129.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 293 minutes ago
FPS
65
84%
Value, $/FPS
$17.68/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1149
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $1,149 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 295 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile
6 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
68.4 GPixel/s
84%
Texel Fillrate
171 GTexel/s
70%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Alienware m16 R2 Gaming Laptop | vs | acer Predator Triton 300 SE 14"" WUXGA 165Hz Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core Ultra 9 185H | CPU | Core i7-12700 |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
240 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 16" | Screen Size | 14" |
