Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — ASUS TUF A16 outperforms the more expensive Acer Predator Triton 500 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of ASUS TUF Gaming A16 Laptop
- Performs up to 178% better in FIFA 23 than Acer Predator Triton 500 - 136 vs 49 FPS
- Up to 3% cheaper than Acer Predator Triton 500 - $1549.0 vs $1600.0
- Up to 65% better value when playing FIFA 23 than Acer Predator Triton 500 - $11.39 vs $32.65 per FPS
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
2nd Variation
FPS
49
36.029411764705884%
Value, $/FPS
$32.65/FPS
34.88514548238898%
Price, $
$1600
96%
Buy for $1,600 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32096 minutes ago
16th Variation
FPS
136
100%
Value, $/FPS
$11.39/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1549
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $1,549 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32340 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
2nd Variation
16th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Mobile
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
88.32 GPixel/s
97.35449735449735%
Texel Fillrate
220.8 GTexel/s
100%
16th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
82.15579710144927%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
2nd Variation
Core i7-10750H
null-core
Single-Core
1446
58.54251012145749%
Multi-Core
5396
46.413211766729745%
16th Variation
Ryzen 9 7940HS
null-core
Single-Core
2470
100%
Multi-Core
11626
100%
CPU Winner
Acer Predator Triton 500 Gaming Laptop | vs | ASUS TUF Gaming A16 Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-10750H | CPU | Ryzen 9 7940HS |
| GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
| 32 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 2560x1440 |
300 Hz | Refresh Rate | 240 Hz |
| 15.6" | Screen Size | 16" |
