Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Asus TUF A16 outperforms the more expensive Acer Predator Triton 500 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Asus TUF Gaming A16 Laptop
- Performs up to 18% better in Deathloop than Acer Predator Triton 500 - 73 vs 62 FPS
- Up to 29% cheaper than Acer Predator Triton 500 - $1140.99 vs $1600.0
- Up to 39% better value when playing Deathloop than Acer Predator Triton 500 - $15.63 vs $25.81 per FPS
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
2nd Variation
FPS
62
84.93150684931507%
Value, $/FPS
$25.81/FPS
60.55792328554824%
Price, $
$1600
71%
Buy for $1,600 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 31793 minutes ago
9th Variation
FPS
73
100%
Value, $/FPS
$15.63/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1140.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $1,140.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 31781 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
2nd Variation
9th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Mobile
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
88.32 GPixel/s
62.72727272727272%
Texel Fillrate
220.8 GTexel/s
89.61038961038962%
9th Variation
Radeon RX 7600S
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
140.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
246.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
2nd Variation
Core i7-10750H
null-core
Single-Core
1446
73.62525458248473%
Multi-Core
5396
58.140286607046654%
9th Variation
Ryzen 7 7735HS
null-core
Single-Core
1964
100%
Multi-Core
9281
100%
CPU Winner
Acer Predator Triton 500 Gaming Laptop | vs | Asus TUF Gaming A16 Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-10750H | CPU | Ryzen 7 7735HS |
| GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Mobile | GPU | Radeon RX 7600S |
| 32 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
300 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 15.6" | Screen Size | 16" |
