Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Asus TUF A16 outperforms the more expensive Acer Predator Triton 300 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Asus TUF Gaming A16 Laptop
- Performs up to 18% better in Deathloop than Acer Predator Triton 300 - 80 vs 68 FPS
- Up to 46% cheaper than Acer Predator Triton 300 - $809.0 vs $1489.0
- Up to 54% better value when playing Deathloop than Acer Predator Triton 300 - $10.11 vs $21.9 per FPS
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
6th Variation
FPS
68
85%
Value, $/FPS
$21.9/FPS
46.16438356164384%
Price, $
$1489
54%
Buy for $1,489 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17382 minutes ago
13th Variation
FPS
80
100%
Value, $/FPS
$10.11/FPS
100%
Price, $
$809
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $809 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17626 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
6th Variation
13th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
6th Variation
GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile
6 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
68.4 GPixel/s
75.3968253968254%
Texel Fillrate
171 GTexel/s
94.26681367144431%
13th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
6th Variation
Core i7-11800H
null-core
Single-Core
1900
96.74134419551935%
Multi-Core
7887
84.98006680314622%
13th Variation
Ryzen 7 7735HS
null-core
Single-Core
1964
100%
Multi-Core
9281
100%
CPU Winner
Acer Predator Triton 300 Gaming Laptop | vs | Asus TUF Gaming A16 Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-11800H | CPU | Ryzen 7 7735HS |
| GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
24 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 2 TB SSD | Storage | 512 GB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 15.6" | Screen Size | 16" |
