Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — ASUS TUF A16 outperforms the more expensive Acer Predator Triton 300 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of ASUS TUF Gaming A16 Laptop
- Performs up to 29% better in War Thunder than Acer Predator Triton 300 - 211 vs 163 FPS
- Up to 17% cheaper than Acer Predator Triton 300 - $1399.0 vs $1689.0
- Up to 36% better value when playing War Thunder than Acer Predator Triton 300 - $6.63 vs $10.36 per FPS
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
12th Variation
FPS
163
77.25118483412322%
Value, $/FPS
$10.36/FPS
63.996138996138995%
Price, $
$1689
82%
Buy for $1,689 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65558 minutes ago
14th Variation
FPS
211
100%
Value, $/FPS
$6.63/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1399
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $1,399 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65549 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
12th Variation
14th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
12th Variation
GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile
6 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
68.4 GPixel/s
75.3968253968254%
Texel Fillrate
171 GTexel/s
94.26681367144431%
14th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
12th Variation
Core i7-11800H
2.3 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
1900
76.92307692307693%
Multi-Core
7887
67.8393256494065%
14th Variation
Ryzen 9 7940HS
4.0 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2470
100%
Multi-Core
11626
100%
CPU Winner
Acer Predator Triton 300 Gaming Laptop | vs | ASUS TUF Gaming A16 Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-11800H | CPU | Ryzen 9 7940HS |
| GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
64 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 2 TB SSD | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 2560x1440 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh Rate | 240 Hz |
| 15.6" | Screen Size | 16" |
