Key Differences
In short — Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-72 outperforms Acer Predator Triton 300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both Laptops to compare value. The better performing Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-72 is 1248 days newer than Acer Predator Triton 300.
Advantages of Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-72 Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 130% better in F1 23 than Acer Predator Triton 300 - 170 vs 74 FPS
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Aug 1st, 2020 • 4th Variation
FPS
74
44%
Value, $/FPS
$18.24/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1350
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $1,350 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 228 minutes ago
Jan 1st, 2024
FPS
170
100%
Value, $/FPS
Price, $
FPS Winner
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Aug 1st, 2020 • 4th Variation
Jan 1st, 2024
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Aug 1st, 2020 • 4th Variation
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
6 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
57.6 GPixel/s
63%
Texel Fillrate
144 GTexel/s
79%
Jan 1st, 2024
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Aug 1st, 2020 • 4th Variation
Core i7-10750H
2.6 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
1446
57%
Multi-Core
5396
38%
Jan 1st, 2024
Core i7-14650HX
2.2 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2530
100%
Multi-Core
14291
100%
CPU Winner
Acer Predator Triton 300 Gaming Laptop | vs | Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-72 Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 1st, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 1st, 2024 |
| Core i7-10750H | CPU | Core i7-14650HX |
| GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 15.6" | Screen Size | 16" |
