The Radeon RX 6700M is at least 2x faster gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon RX 6700M
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 67% more VRAM memory – 10 vs 6 GB
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- Consumes up to 11% less energy – 120 vs 135 Watts
Radeon RX 6700M vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon RX 6700M
May 31st, 2021
Average FPS
104
100%
Min 1% FPS
58
100%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Feb 22nd, 2019
Average FPS
83
80%
Min 1% FPS
44
76%
Price, $
$349.22
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.2/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
$349.22
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$349.99
In Stock
Radeon RX 6700M vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon RX 6700M vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon RX 6700M vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon RX 6700M
May 31st, 2021
Memory
10 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
320 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
153.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
345.6 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
11.06 TFLOPS
100%
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Feb 22nd, 2019
Memory
6 GB
60%
Memory Bandwidth
288 GB/s
90%
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
55%
Texture Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
49%
FP32
5.437 TFLOPS
49%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon RX 6700M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
May 31st, 2021 | Release Date | Feb 22nd, 2019 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $279.00 |
| Navi Mobile | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| 135 W | Power Consumption | 120 W |
| Memory | ||
10 GB | Memory Size | 6 GB |
| GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 160-bit | Memory Bus | 192-bit |
320 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
153.6 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 84.96 GPixel/s |
345.6 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 169.9 GTexel/s |
11.06 TFLOPS | FP32 | 5.437 TFLOPS |
