The Radeon RX 6650M XT is a much faster gaming GPU than the Radeon PRO W7500. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon RX 6650M XT
- A much faster GPU for gaming
Advantages of the Radeon PRO W7500
- Consumes up to 42% less energy – 70 vs 120 Watts
Radeon RX 6650M XT vs Radeon PRO W7500 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon RX 6650M XT
Jan 4th, 2022
Average FPS
102
100%
Min 1% FPS
57
100%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon PRO W7500
Aug 3rd, 2023
Average FPS
84
82%
Min 1% FPS
45
79%
Price, $
$428.98
100%
Value, $/FPS
$5.1/FPS
100%
Radeon RX 6650M XT vs Radeon PRO W7500 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon RX 6650M XT vs Radeon PRO W7500 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon RX 6650M XT vs Radeon PRO W7500 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon RX 6650M XT
Jan 4th, 2022
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
256 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
154.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
309.2 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
9.896 TFLOPS
81%
Radeon PRO W7500
Aug 3rd, 2023
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
172 GB/s
67%
Pixel Fillrate
108.8 GPixel/s
70%
Texture Fillrate
190.4 GTexel/s
62%
FP32
12.19 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon RX 6650M XT | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Aug 3rd, 2023 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $429.00 |
| Navi Mobile | Generation | Radeon Pro Navi |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| 120 W | Power Consumption | 70 W |
| Memory | ||
| 8 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
256 GB/s | Bandwidth | 172 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
154.6 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 108.8 GPixel/s |
309.2 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 190.4 GTexel/s |
| 9.896 TFLOPS | FP32 | 12.19 TFLOPS |
