Key Differences
In short — Radeon PRO W7500 outperforms GeForce GTX 1660 Ti on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Radeon PRO W7500 is 1623 days newer than GeForce GTX 1660 Ti.
Advantages of Radeon PRO W7500
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - 70 vs 120 Watts
- Up to 33% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - 8 vs 6 GB
Advantages of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- Up to 7% better value when playing New World than Radeon PRO W7500 - $4.38 vs $4.71 per FPS
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $428.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 132 minutes ago
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
FPS
91
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.38/FPS
100%
Price, $
$399
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $399 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 130 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Aug 3rd, 2023
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Aug 3rd, 2023
Pixel Fillrate
108.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
190.4 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
78%
Texel Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
89%
Radeon PRO W7500 | vs | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
---|---|---|
Aug 3rd, 2023 | Release Date | Feb 22nd, 2019 |
Radeon Pro Navi | Generation | GeForce 16 |
$429 | MSRP | $279 |
4x DisplayPort 2.1 | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 GB | Memory | 6 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 192-bit |
172 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
1500 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
1700 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1770 MHz |
1344 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |