The Radeon RX 6650M XT is a much faster gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon RX 6650M XT
- A much faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 33% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 6 GB
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
The Radeon RX 6650M XT is better in every way
Radeon RX 6650M XT vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon RX 6650M XT
Jan 4th, 2022
Average FPS
102
100%
Min 1% FPS
57
100%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Feb 22nd, 2019
Average FPS
83
81%
Min 1% FPS
44
77%
Price, $
$349.22
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.2/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
$349.22
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$423.74
In Stock
Radeon RX 6650M XT vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon RX 6650M XT vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon RX 6650M XT vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon RX 6650M XT
Jan 4th, 2022
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
256 GB/s
89%
Pixel Fillrate
154.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
309.2 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
9.896 TFLOPS
100%
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Feb 22nd, 2019
Memory
6 GB
75%
Memory Bandwidth
288 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
55%
Texture Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
55%
FP32
5.437 TFLOPS
55%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon RX 6650M XT | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Feb 22nd, 2019 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $279.00 |
| Navi Mobile | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| 120 W | Power Consumption | 120 W |
| Memory | ||
8 GB | Memory Size | 6 GB |
| GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 192-bit |
| 256 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
154.6 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 84.96 GPixel/s |
309.2 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 169.9 GTexel/s |
9.896 TFLOPS | FP32 | 5.437 TFLOPS |
