The Radeon RX 5700 XT is the comparison's loser – it's a slower gaming GPU than the Arc A750 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $30.00 more expensive!
Advantages of the Radeon RX 5700 XT
The Arc A750 is better in every way
Advantages of the Arc A750
- A much faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 14% cheaper – $179.99 vs $209.99
- A better value for money for gaming
Radeon RX 5700 XT vs Arc A750 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon RX 5700 XT
Jul 7th, 2019
Average FPS
104
85%
Min 1% FPS
58
82%
Price, $
$209.99
85%
Value, $/FPS
$2.01/FPS
73%
Buy on Amazon
$209.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$239.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$529.00
In Stock
Arc A750
Oct 12th, 2022
Average FPS
122
100%
Min 1% FPS
71
100%
Price, $
$179.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.47/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
$179.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$179.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$185.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$279.00
In Stock
Radeon RX 5700 XT vs Arc A750 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon RX 5700 XT vs Arc A750 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon RX 5700 XT vs Arc A750 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon RX 5700 XT
Jul 7th, 2019
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
448 GB/s
88%
Pixel Fillrate
121.9 GPixel/s
45%
Texture Fillrate
304.8 GTexel/s
57%
FP32
9.754 TFLOPS
57%
Arc A750
Oct 12th, 2022
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
268.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
537.6 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
17.2 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon RX 5700 XT | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2022 |
| $399.00 | MSRP | $289.00 |
| Navi | Generation | Alchemist |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 225 W | Power Consumption | 225 W |
| Memory | ||
| 8 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 256-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 448 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 121.9 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 268.8 GPixel/s |
| 304.8 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 537.6 GTexel/s |
| 9.754 TFLOPS | FP32 | 17.2 TFLOPS |
