The Radeon RX 5700 XT is a clear winner – it's at least 2x faster gaming GPU than the Radeon R7 240 and it's also a much better value for money, as it's only $469.05 more expensive!
Advantages of the Radeon RX 5700 XT
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 2 GB
Advantages of the Radeon R7 240
- Up to 87% cheaper – $69.95 vs $539.00
- Consumes up to 87% less energy – 30 vs 225 Watts
Radeon RX 5700 XT vs Radeon R7 240 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon RX 5700 XT
Jul 7th, 2019
Average FPS
104
100%
Min 1% FPS
58
100%
Price, $
$539
12%
Value, $/FPS
$5.18/FPS
33%
Buy on Amazon
$539.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$529.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$529.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$239.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$69.95
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$125.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
N/A
Out of Stock
Radeon RX 5700 XT vs Radeon R7 240 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon RX 5700 XT vs Radeon R7 240 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon RX 5700 XT vs Radeon R7 240 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon RX 5700 XT
Jul 7th, 2019
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
448 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
121.9 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
304.8 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
9.754 TFLOPS
100%
Radeon R7 240
Oct 8th, 2013
Memory
2 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
73.6 GB/s
16%
Pixel Fillrate
5.6 GPixel/s
5%
Texture Fillrate
14 GTexel/s
5%
FP32
448 GFLOPS
5%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon RX 5700 XT | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon R7 240 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 8th, 2013 |
| $399.00 | MSRP | $69.00 |
| Navi | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 225 W | Power Consumption | 30 W |
| Memory | ||
8 GB | Memory Size | 2 GB |
| GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 256-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
448 GB/s | Bandwidth | 73.6 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
121.9 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 5.6 GPixel/s |
304.8 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 14 GTexel/s |
9.754 TFLOPS | FP32 | 448 GFLOPS |
