The Radeon RX 560 XT is a much slower gaming GPU than the Radeon Pro WX 9100. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon RX 560 XT
- Consumes up to 35% less energy – 150 vs 230 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon Pro WX 9100
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 4 GB
Radeon RX 560 XT vs Radeon Pro WX 9100 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon RX 560 XT
Mar 13th, 2019
Average FPS
64
76%
Min 1% FPS
31
69%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon Pro WX 9100
Jul 10th, 2017
Average FPS
84
100%
Min 1% FPS
45
100%
Price, $
$786.96
100%
Value, $/FPS
$9.36/FPS
100%
Radeon RX 560 XT vs Radeon Pro WX 9100 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon RX 560 XT vs Radeon Pro WX 9100 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon RX 560 XT vs Radeon Pro WX 9100 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon RX 560 XT
Mar 13th, 2019
Memory
4 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
224 GB/s
46%
Pixel Fillrate
39.23 GPixel/s
41%
Texture Fillrate
137.3 GTexel/s
36%
FP32
4.394 TFLOPS
36%
Radeon Pro WX 9100
Jul 10th, 2017
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
483.8 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
96 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
384 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
12.29 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon RX 560 XT | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon Pro WX 9100 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Mar 13th, 2019 | Release Date | Jul 10th, 2017 |
Not Available | MSRP | $1,599.00 |
Polaris | Generation | Radeon Pro Polaris |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
150 W | Power Consumption | 230 W |
Memory | ||
4 GB | Memory Size | 16 GB |
GDDR5 | Memory Type | HBM2 |
256-bit | Memory Bus | 2048-bit |
224 GB/s | Bandwidth | 483.8 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
39.23 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 96 GPixel/s |
137.3 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 384 GTexel/s |
4.394 TFLOPS | FP32 | 12.29 TFLOPS |