The Radeon RX 560 XT is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce RTX 4070. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon RX 560 XT
- Consumes up to 25% less energy – 150 vs 200 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 4070
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 200% more VRAM memory – 12 vs 4 GB
Radeon RX 560 XT vs GeForce RTX 4070 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon RX 560 XT
Mar 13th, 2019
Average FPS
64
42%
Min 1% FPS
31
34%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce RTX 4070
Apr 12th, 2023
Average FPS
152
100%
Min 1% FPS
92
100%
Price, $
$699
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.59/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
$699.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$933.22
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$789.95
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$1,879.99
In Stock
Radeon RX 560 XT vs GeForce RTX 4070 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon RX 560 XT vs GeForce RTX 4070 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon RX 560 XT vs GeForce RTX 4070 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon RX 560 XT
Mar 13th, 2019
Memory
4 GB
33%
Memory Bandwidth
224 GB/s
44%
Pixel Fillrate
39.23 GPixel/s
25%
Texture Fillrate
137.3 GTexel/s
30%
FP32
4.394 TFLOPS
15%
GeForce RTX 4070
Apr 12th, 2023
Memory
12 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
504.2 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
29.15 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon RX 560 XT | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce RTX 4070 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Mar 13th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 12th, 2023 |
Not Available | MSRP | $599.00 |
Polaris | Generation | GeForce 40 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
150 W | Power Consumption | 200 W |
Memory | ||
4 GB | Memory Size | 12 GB |
GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6X |
256-bit | Memory Bus | 192-bit |
224 GB/s | Bandwidth | 504.2 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
39.23 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 158.4 GPixel/s |
137.3 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 455.4 GTexel/s |
4.394 TFLOPS | FP32 | 29.15 TFLOPS |