The Radeon RX 560 is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 6650 XT and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's only $237.92 cheaper!
Advantages of the Radeon RX 560
- Up to 53% cheaper – $211.84 vs $449.76
- Consumes up to 57% less energy – 75 vs 176 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon RX 6650 XT
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 4 GB
Radeon RX 560 vs Radeon RX 6650 XT for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon RX 560
Apr 18th, 2017
Average FPS
52
49%
Min 1% FPS
23
38%
Price, $
$211.84
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.07/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
$211.84
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$185.45
In Stock
Radeon RX 6650 XT
May 10th, 2022
Average FPS
107
100%
Min 1% FPS
60
100%
Price, $
$449.76
47%
Value, $/FPS
$4.2/FPS
97%
Buy on Amazon
$449.76
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$1,819.67
In Stock
Radeon RX 560 vs Radeon RX 6650 XT in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon RX 560 vs Radeon RX 6650 XT in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon RX 560 vs Radeon RX 6650 XT in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon RX 560
Apr 18th, 2017
Memory
4 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
112 GB/s
40%
Pixel Fillrate
20.4 GPixel/s
12%
Texture Fillrate
81.6 GTexel/s
24%
FP32
2.611 TFLOPS
24%
Radeon RX 6650 XT
May 10th, 2022
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
280.3 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
168.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
337.3 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
10.79 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon RX 560 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 6650 XT |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Apr 18th, 2017 | Release Date | May 10th, 2022 |
$99.00 | MSRP | $399.00 |
Polaris | Generation | Navi II |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
75 W | Power Consumption | 176 W |
Memory | ||
4 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
112 GB/s | Bandwidth | 280.3 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
20.4 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 168.6 GPixel/s |
81.6 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 337.3 GTexel/s |
2.611 TFLOPS | FP32 | 10.79 TFLOPS |