The Radeon RX 6650 XT is the comparison's loser – it's a much slower gaming GPU than the Arc B580 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $1422.68 more expensive!
Advantages of the Radeon RX 6650 XT
- Consumes up to 7% less energy – 176 vs 190 Watts
Advantages of the Arc B580
- A much faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 78% cheaper – $396.99 vs $1819.67
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Up to 50% more VRAM memory – 12 vs 8 GB
Radeon RX 6650 XT vs Arc B580 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon RX 6650 XT
May 10th, 2022
Average FPS
107
79%
Min 1% FPS
60
75%
Price, $
$1819.67
21%
Value, $/FPS
$17/FPS
17%
Arc B580
Jan 16th, 2025
Average FPS
135
100%
Min 1% FPS
80
100%
Price, $
$396.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.94/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
$396.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$368.99
In Stock
Radeon RX 6650 XT vs Arc B580 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon RX 6650 XT vs Arc B580 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon RX 6650 XT vs Arc B580 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon RX 6650 XT
May 10th, 2022
Memory
8 GB
67%
Memory Bandwidth
280.3 GB/s
61%
Pixel Fillrate
168.6 GPixel/s
79%
Texture Fillrate
337.3 GTexel/s
79%
FP32
10.79 TFLOPS
79%
Arc B580
Jan 16th, 2025
Memory
12 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
456 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
213.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
427.2 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
13.67 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon RX 6650 XT | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Arc B580 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 10th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 16th, 2025 |
| $399.00 | MSRP | $249.00 |
| Navi II | Generation | Battlemage |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
176 W | Power Consumption | 190 W |
| Memory | ||
| 8 GB | Memory Size | 12 GB |
| GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 192-bit |
| 280.3 GB/s | Bandwidth | 456 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 168.6 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 213.6 GPixel/s |
| 337.3 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 427.2 GTexel/s |
| 10.79 TFLOPS | FP32 | 13.67 TFLOPS |
