The Radeon RX 5300M is a much slower gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon RX 5300M
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 85 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 6 vs 3 GB
Radeon RX 5300M vs GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon RX 5300M
Nov 13th, 2019
Average FPS
65
80%
Min 1% FPS
32
74%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
Oct 29th, 2019
Average FPS
81
100%
Min 1% FPS
43
100%
Price, $
$179.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.22/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
$179.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$174.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$189.99
In Stock
Radeon RX 5300M vs GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon RX 5300M vs GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon RX 5300M vs GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon RX 5300M
Nov 13th, 2019
Memory
3 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
168 GB/s
50%
Pixel Fillrate
46.24 GPixel/s
54%
Texture Fillrate
127.2 GTexel/s
81%
FP32
4.069 TFLOPS
81%
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
Oct 29th, 2019
Memory
6 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
336 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
85.68 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
157.1 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
5.027 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon RX 5300M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Nov 13th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 29th, 2019 |
Not Available | MSRP | $229.00 |
Navi Mobile | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
85 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
Memory | ||
3 GB | Memory Size | 6 GB |
GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
96-bit | Memory Bus | 192-bit |
168 GB/s | Bandwidth | 336 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
46.24 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 85.68 GPixel/s |
127.2 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 157.1 GTexel/s |
4.069 TFLOPS | FP32 | 5.027 TFLOPS |