The Radeon RX 5300M is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Arc A770. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon RX 5300M
- Consumes up to 62% less energy – 85 vs 225 Watts
Advantages of the Arc A770
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 433% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 3 GB
Radeon RX 5300M vs Arc A770 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon RX 5300M
Nov 13th, 2019
Average FPS
65
51%
Min 1% FPS
32
43%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Arc A770
Oct 12th, 2022
Average FPS
128
100%
Min 1% FPS
75
100%
Price, $
$598.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.67/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
$598.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$359.00
In Stock
Radeon RX 5300M vs Arc A770 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon RX 5300M vs Arc A770 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon RX 5300M vs Arc A770 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon RX 5300M
Nov 13th, 2019
Memory
3 GB
19%
Memory Bandwidth
168 GB/s
33%
Pixel Fillrate
46.24 GPixel/s
15%
Texture Fillrate
127.2 GTexel/s
21%
FP32
4.069 TFLOPS
21%
Arc A770
Oct 12th, 2022
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
307.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
614.4 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
19.66 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon RX 5300M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Arc A770 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Nov 13th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2022 |
Not Available | MSRP | $329.00 |
Navi Mobile | Generation | Alchemist |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
85 W | Power Consumption | 225 W |
Memory | ||
3 GB | Memory Size | 16 GB |
GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
96-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
168 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
46.24 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 307.2 GPixel/s |
127.2 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 614.4 GTexel/s |
4.069 TFLOPS | FP32 | 19.66 TFLOPS |