The Radeon R9 Nano is a slightly faster gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R9 Nano
- A slightly faster GPU for gaming
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
- Consumes up to 31% less energy – 120 vs 175 Watts
- Up to 50% more VRAM memory – 6 vs 4 GB
Radeon R9 Nano vs GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 Nano
Aug 27th, 2015
Average FPS
72
100%
Min 1% FPS
37
100%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
Jul 19th, 2016
Average FPS
69
96%
Min 1% FPS
34
92%
Price, $
$227.9
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.3/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
$227.90
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$399.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$379.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$349.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$359.00
In Stock
Radeon R9 Nano vs GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 Nano vs GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 Nano vs GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 Nano
Aug 27th, 2015
Memory
4 GB
67%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
64 GPixel/s
78%
Texture Fillrate
256 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
8.192 TFLOPS
100%
GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
Jul 19th, 2016
Memory
6 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
192.2 GB/s
38%
Pixel Fillrate
82.03 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
136.7 GTexel/s
53%
FP32
4.375 TFLOPS
53%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 Nano | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Aug 27th, 2015 | Release Date | Jul 19th, 2016 |
$649.00 | MSRP | $299.00 |
Pirate Islands | Generation | GeForce 10 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
175 W | Power Consumption | 120 W |
Memory | ||
4 GB | Memory Size | 6 GB |
HBM | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
4096-bit | Memory Bus | 192-bit |
512 GB/s | Bandwidth | 192.2 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
64 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 82.03 GPixel/s |
256 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 136.7 GTexel/s |
8.192 TFLOPS | FP32 | 4.375 TFLOPS |