The Radeon R9 295X2 is a slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 6500 XT. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R9 295X2
The Radeon RX 6500 XT is better in every way
Advantages of the Radeon RX 6500 XT
- A much faster GPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 79% less energy – 107 vs 500 Watts
Radeon R9 295X2 vs Radeon RX 6500 XT for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 295X2
Apr 29th, 2014
Average FPS
67
91%
Min 1% FPS
33
87%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon RX 6500 XT
Jan 19th, 2022
Average FPS
74
100%
Min 1% FPS
38
100%
Price, $
$179.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.43/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
$179.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$246.43
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$189.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$159.00
In Stock
Radeon R9 295X2 vs Radeon RX 6500 XT in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 295X2 vs Radeon RX 6500 XT in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 295X2 vs Radeon RX 6500 XT in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 295X2
Apr 29th, 2014
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
320 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
65.15 GPixel/s
72%
Texture Fillrate
179.2 GTexel/s
99%
FP32
5.733 TFLOPS
99%
Radeon RX 6500 XT
Jan 19th, 2022
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
143.9 GB/s
45%
Pixel Fillrate
90.08 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
180.2 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
5.765 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 295X2 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 6500 XT |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Apr 29th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 19th, 2022 |
$1,499.00 | MSRP | $199.00 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | Navi II |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
500 W | Power Consumption | 107 W |
Memory | ||
4 GB | Memory Size | 4 GB |
GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
512-bit | Memory Bus | 64-bit |
320 GB/s | Bandwidth | 143.9 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
65.15 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 90.08 GPixel/s |
179.2 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 180.2 GTexel/s |
5.733 TFLOPS | FP32 | 5.765 TFLOPS |