The Radeon R9 295X2 is a slightly faster gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 6400. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R9 295X2
- A slightly faster GPU for gaming
Advantages of the Radeon RX 6400
- Consumes up to 89% less energy – 53 vs 500 Watts
Radeon R9 295X2 vs Radeon RX 6400 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 295X2
Apr 29th, 2014
Average FPS
67
100%
Min 1% FPS
33
100%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon RX 6400
Jan 19th, 2022
Average FPS
64
96%
Min 1% FPS
31
94%
Price, $
$271.75
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.24/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
$271.75
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$207.09
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$362.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
N/A
Out of Stock
Buy on Amazon
N/A
Out of Stock
Buy on Amazon
N/A
Out of Stock
Radeon R9 295X2 vs Radeon RX 6400 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 295X2 vs Radeon RX 6400 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 295X2 vs Radeon RX 6400 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 295X2
Apr 29th, 2014
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
320 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
65.15 GPixel/s
88%
Texture Fillrate
179.2 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
5.733 TFLOPS
100%
Radeon RX 6400
Jan 19th, 2022
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
128 GB/s
40%
Pixel Fillrate
74.27 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
111.4 GTexel/s
62%
FP32
3.565 TFLOPS
62%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 295X2 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 6400 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Apr 29th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 19th, 2022 |
$1,499.00 | MSRP | $159.00 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | Navi II |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
500 W | Power Consumption | 53 W |
Memory | ||
4 GB | Memory Size | 4 GB |
GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
512-bit | Memory Bus | 64-bit |
320 GB/s | Bandwidth | 128 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
65.15 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 74.27 GPixel/s |
179.2 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 111.4 GTexel/s |
5.733 TFLOPS | FP32 | 3.565 TFLOPS |