Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 295X2 outperforms GeForce GTX 750 Ti on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both GPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 295X2 is 70 days newer than GeForce GTX 750 Ti.
Advantages of Radeon R9 295X2
- Performs up to 53% better in Starfield than GeForce GTX 750 Ti - 23 vs 15 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti - 4 vs 2 GB
Advantages of GeForce GTX 750 Ti
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 295X2 - 60 vs 500 Watts
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 18th, 2014
FPS
15
65%
Value, $/FPS
$11/FPS
100%
Price, $
$164.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $164.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 90 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2014
Desktop • Feb 18th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
65.15 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
179.2 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Feb 18th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
17.36 GPixel/s
27%
Texel Fillrate
43.4 GTexel/s
24%
Radeon R9 295X2 | vs | GeForce GTX 750 Ti |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2014 | Release Date | Feb 18th, 2014 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 700 |
$1499 | MSRP | $149 |
1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
3x 8-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
512-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
320 GB/s | Bandwidth | 86.4 GB/s |
1018 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1020 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1085 MHz |
1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1350 MHz |