The Radeon R9 295X2 is a much slower gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R9 295X2
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is better in every way
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 76% less energy – 120 vs 500 Watts
- Up to 50% more VRAM memory – 6 vs 4 GB
Radeon R9 295X2 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 295X2
Apr 29th, 2014
Average FPS
67
81%
Min 1% FPS
33
75%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Feb 22nd, 2019
Average FPS
83
100%
Min 1% FPS
44
100%
Price, $
$349.22
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.2/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
$349.22
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$423.74
In Stock
Radeon R9 295X2 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 295X2 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 295X2 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 295X2
Apr 29th, 2014
Memory
4 GB
67%
Memory Bandwidth
320 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
65.15 GPixel/s
77%
Texture Fillrate
179.2 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
5.733 TFLOPS
100%
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Feb 22nd, 2019
Memory
6 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
288 GB/s
90%
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
95%
FP32
5.437 TFLOPS
95%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 295X2 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 29th, 2014 | Release Date | Feb 22nd, 2019 |
| $1,499.00 | MSRP | $279.00 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 500 W | Power Consumption | 120 W |
| Memory | ||
| 4 GB | Memory Size | 6 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 512-bit | Memory Bus | 192-bit |
320 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 65.15 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 84.96 GPixel/s |
179.2 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 169.9 GTexel/s |
5.733 TFLOPS | FP32 | 5.437 TFLOPS |
