In Battlefield 6, the Radeon R9 295X2 is much slower than the Arc A750. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Radeon R9 295X2
No clear advantages
Arc A750
- Up to 229% faster in Battlefield 6 – 69 vs 21 FPS
- Up to 229% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 8 years and 5 months newer – Oct 12, 2022 vs Apr 29, 2014
- Is 8 years and 5 months newer
- Consumes up to 55% less energy – 225 vs 500 Watts
- Consumes up to 55% less energy
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 4 GB
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Radeon R9 295X2 vs Arc A750: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Arc A750
Oct 12th, 2022
Average FPS
69 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
52 FPS
100%
Price, $
$526.72
100%
Value, $/FPS
$7.63/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
Radeon R9 295X2 vs Arc A750: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
Radeon R9 295X2 vs Arc A750: Comparison of core performance specifications
Radeon R9 295X2
Apr 29th, 2014
Memory
4 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
320 GB/s
62%
Pixel Fillrate
65.15 GPixel/s
24%
Texture Fillrate
179.2 GTexel/s
33%
FP32
5.733 TFLOPS
33%
Arc A750
Oct 12th, 2022
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
268.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
537.6 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
17.2 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Radeon R9 295X2 Apr 29th, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Arc A750 Oct 12th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 29th, 2014 | Released | Oct 12th, 2022 |
| $1,499.00 | MSRP | $289.00 |
| Volcanic Islands (R9 200) | Generation | Alchemist (Arc 7) |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 500 W | Power Consumption | 225 W |
