The Radeon R9 285 is at least 2x faster gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 550. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R9 285
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
Advantages of the Radeon RX 550
- Consumes up to 74% less energy – 50 vs 190 Watts
Radeon R9 285 vs Radeon RX 550 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 285
Sep 2nd, 2014
Average FPS
58
100%
Min 1% FPS
27
100%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon RX 550
Apr 20th, 2017
Average FPS
47
81%
Min 1% FPS
20
74%
Price, $
$79.98
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.7/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
$79.98
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$209.99
In Stock
Radeon R9 285 vs Radeon RX 550 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 285 vs Radeon RX 550 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 285 vs Radeon RX 550 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 285
Sep 2nd, 2014
Memory
2 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
176 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
29.38 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
102.8 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
3.29 TFLOPS
100%
Radeon RX 550
Apr 20th, 2017
Memory
2 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
112 GB/s
64%
Pixel Fillrate
18.93 GPixel/s
64%
Texture Fillrate
37.86 GTexel/s
37%
FP32
1.211 TFLOPS
37%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 285 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 20th, 2017 |
| $249.00 | MSRP | $79.00 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | Polaris |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 190 W | Power Consumption | 50 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 2 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 256-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
176 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
29.38 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 18.93 GPixel/s |
102.8 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 37.86 GTexel/s |
3.29 TFLOPS | FP32 | 1.211 TFLOPS |
