The Radeon R7 265 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Arc A750. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R7 265
- Consumes up to 33% less energy – 150 vs 225 Watts
Advantages of the Arc A750
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 2 GB
Radeon R7 265 vs Arc A750 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R7 265
Feb 13th, 2014
Average FPS
48
39%
Min 1% FPS
21
30%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Arc A750
Oct 12th, 2022
Average FPS
122
100%
Min 1% FPS
71
100%
Price, $
$199.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.63/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
$199.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$185.31
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$199.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$279.00
In Stock
Radeon R7 265 vs Arc A750 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R7 265 vs Arc A750 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R7 265 vs Arc A750 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R7 265
Feb 13th, 2014
Memory
2 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
179.2 GB/s
35%
Pixel Fillrate
29.6 GPixel/s
11%
Texture Fillrate
59.2 GTexel/s
11%
FP32
1.894 TFLOPS
11%
Arc A750
Oct 12th, 2022
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
268.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
537.6 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
17.2 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R7 265 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Feb 13th, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2022 |
$149.00 | MSRP | $289.00 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | Alchemist |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
150 W | Power Consumption | 225 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 256-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 179.2 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 29.6 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 268.8 GPixel/s |
| 59.2 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 537.6 GTexel/s |
| 1.894 TFLOPS | FP32 | 17.2 TFLOPS |
