The Radeon R7 260 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 6500 XT. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R7 260
- Consumes up to 11% less energy – 95 vs 107 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon RX 6500 XT
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 4 vs 2 GB
Radeon R7 260 vs Radeon RX 6500 XT for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R7 260
Dec 17th, 2013
Average FPS
47
64%
Min 1% FPS
20
53%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon RX 6500 XT
Jan 19th, 2022
Average FPS
74
100%
Min 1% FPS
38
100%
Price, $
$224
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.02/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
$224.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$179.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$189.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$159.00
In Stock
Radeon R7 260 vs Radeon RX 6500 XT in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R7 260 vs Radeon RX 6500 XT in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R7 260 vs Radeon RX 6500 XT in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R7 260
Dec 17th, 2013
Memory
2 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
96 GB/s
67%
Pixel Fillrate
16 GPixel/s
18%
Texture Fillrate
48 GTexel/s
27%
FP32
1.536 TFLOPS
27%
Radeon RX 6500 XT
Jan 19th, 2022
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
143.9 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
90.08 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
180.2 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
5.765 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R7 260 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 6500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Dec 17th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 19th, 2022 |
$109.00 | MSRP | $199.00 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | Navi II |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
95 W | Power Consumption | 107 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 4 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 64-bit |
| 96 GB/s | Bandwidth | 143.9 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 16 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 90.08 GPixel/s |
| 48 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 180.2 GTexel/s |
| 1.536 TFLOPS | FP32 | 5.765 TFLOPS |
