The Radeon R7 260 is a much slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 560. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R7 260
The Radeon RX 560 is better in every way
Advantages of the Radeon RX 560
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 21% less energy – 75 vs 95 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 4 vs 2 GB
Radeon R7 260 vs Radeon RX 560 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R7 260
Dec 17th, 2013
Average FPS
47
90%
Min 1% FPS
20
87%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon RX 560
Apr 18th, 2017
Average FPS
52
100%
Min 1% FPS
23
100%
Price, $
$210.61
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.05/FPS
100%
Radeon R7 260 vs Radeon RX 560 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R7 260 vs Radeon RX 560 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R7 260 vs Radeon RX 560 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R7 260
Dec 17th, 2013
Memory
2 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
96 GB/s
86%
Pixel Fillrate
16 GPixel/s
78%
Texture Fillrate
48 GTexel/s
59%
FP32
1.536 TFLOPS
59%
Radeon RX 560
Apr 18th, 2017
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
112 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
20.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
81.6 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
2.611 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R7 260 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Dec 17th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 18th, 2017 |
| $109.00 | MSRP | $99.00 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | Polaris |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | 75 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 4 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
| 96 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 16 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 20.4 GPixel/s |
| 48 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 81.6 GTexel/s |
| 1.536 TFLOPS | FP32 | 2.611 TFLOPS |
