The Radeon R7 240 is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 560 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's only $139.83 cheaper!
Advantages of the Radeon R7 240
- Up to 67% cheaper – $69.95 vs $209.78
- Consumes up to 60% less energy – 30 vs 75 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon RX 560
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A better value for money for gaming
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 4 vs 2 GB
Radeon R7 240 vs Radeon RX 560 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Buy on Amazon
$69.95
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$125.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
N/A
Out of Stock
Radeon RX 560
Apr 18th, 2017
Average FPS
52
100%
Min 1% FPS
23
100%
Price, $
$209.78
33%
Value, $/FPS
$4.03/FPS
42%
Radeon R7 240 vs Radeon RX 560 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R7 240 vs Radeon RX 560 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R7 240 vs Radeon RX 560 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R7 240
Oct 8th, 2013
Memory
2 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
73.6 GB/s
66%
Pixel Fillrate
5.6 GPixel/s
27%
Texture Fillrate
14 GTexel/s
17%
FP32
448 GFLOPS
17%
Radeon RX 560
Apr 18th, 2017
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
112 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
20.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
81.6 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
2.611 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R7 240 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 18th, 2017 |
$69.00 | MSRP | $99.00 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | Polaris |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
30 W | Power Consumption | 75 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 4 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
| 73.6 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 5.6 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 20.4 GPixel/s |
| 14 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 81.6 GTexel/s |
| 448 GFLOPS | FP32 | 2.611 TFLOPS |
