The Radeon Pro WX 9100 is a much faster gaming GPU than the Radeon Pro W5500, however, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $624.97 more expensive!
Advantages of the Radeon Pro WX 9100
- A much faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 8 GB
Advantages of the Radeon Pro W5500
- Up to 79% cheaper – $161.99 vs $786.96
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 125 vs 230 Watts
Radeon Pro WX 9100 vs Radeon Pro W5500 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon Pro WX 9100
Jul 10th, 2017
Average FPS
84
100%
Min 1% FPS
45
100%
Price, $
$786.96
20%
Value, $/FPS
$9.36/FPS
24%
Radeon Pro W5500
Feb 10th, 2020
Average FPS
73
87%
Min 1% FPS
37
82%
Price, $
$161.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.21/FPS
100%
Radeon Pro WX 9100 vs Radeon Pro W5500 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon Pro WX 9100 vs Radeon Pro W5500 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon Pro WX 9100 vs Radeon Pro W5500 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon Pro WX 9100
Jul 10th, 2017
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
483.8 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
96 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
384 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
12.29 TFLOPS
100%
Radeon Pro W5500
Feb 10th, 2020
Memory
8 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
224 GB/s
46%
Pixel Fillrate
59.36 GPixel/s
62%
Texture Fillrate
163.2 GTexel/s
42%
FP32
5.224 TFLOPS
43%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon Pro WX 9100 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon Pro W5500 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jul 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Feb 10th, 2020 |
| $1,599.00 | MSRP | $399.00 |
| Radeon Pro Polaris | Generation | Radeon Pro Navi |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 230 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Memory | ||
16 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| HBM2 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 2048-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
483.8 GB/s | Bandwidth | 224 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
96 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 59.36 GPixel/s |
384 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 163.2 GTexel/s |
12.29 TFLOPS | FP32 | 5.224 TFLOPS |
