The Radeon Pro WX 4100 is a slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 560, however, it's a better value for money, as it's $90.59 cheaper!
Advantages of the Radeon Pro WX 4100
- Up to 43% cheaper – $120.02 vs $210.61
- A better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 33% less energy – 50 vs 75 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon RX 560
- A faster GPU for gaming
Radeon Pro WX 4100 vs Radeon RX 560 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon Pro WX 4100
Nov 10th, 2016
Average FPS
49
94%
Min 1% FPS
21
91%
Price, $
$120.02
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.44/FPS
100%
Radeon RX 560
Apr 18th, 2017
Average FPS
52
100%
Min 1% FPS
23
100%
Price, $
$210.61
56%
Value, $/FPS
$4.05/FPS
60%
Radeon Pro WX 4100 vs Radeon RX 560 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon Pro WX 4100 vs Radeon RX 560 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon Pro WX 4100 vs Radeon RX 560 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon Pro WX 4100
Nov 10th, 2016
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
96 GB/s
86%
Pixel Fillrate
19.22 GPixel/s
94%
Texture Fillrate
76.86 GTexel/s
94%
FP32
2.46 TFLOPS
94%
Radeon RX 560
Apr 18th, 2017
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
112 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
20.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
81.6 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
2.611 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon Pro WX 4100 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Nov 10th, 2016 | Release Date | Apr 18th, 2017 |
| $399.00 | MSRP | $99.00 |
| Radeon Pro Polaris | Generation | Polaris |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
50 W | Power Consumption | 75 W |
| Memory | ||
| 4 GB | Memory Size | 4 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
| 96 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 19.22 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 20.4 GPixel/s |
| 76.86 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 81.6 GTexel/s |
| 2.46 TFLOPS | FP32 | 2.611 TFLOPS |
