The Radeon Pro W5700 is a clear winner – it's at least 2x faster gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 970 and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $39.01 cheaper!
Advantages of the Radeon Pro W5700
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 13% cheaper – $259.99 vs $299.00
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 4 GB
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 970
- Consumes up to 28% less energy – 148 vs 205 Watts
Radeon Pro W5700 vs GeForce GTX 970 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon Pro W5700
Nov 19th, 2019
Average FPS
98
100%
Min 1% FPS
54
100%
Price, $
$259.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.65/FPS
100%
Radeon Pro W5700 vs GeForce GTX 970 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon Pro W5700 vs GeForce GTX 970 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon Pro W5700 vs GeForce GTX 970 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon Pro W5700
Nov 19th, 2019
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
448 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
120.3 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
270.7 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
8.663 TFLOPS
100%
GeForce GTX 970
Sep 19th, 2014
Memory
4 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
224.4 GB/s
50%
Pixel Fillrate
65.97 GPixel/s
55%
Texture Fillrate
122.5 GTexel/s
45%
FP32
3.92 TFLOPS
45%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon Pro W5700 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 970 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Nov 19th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 19th, 2014 |
| $799.00 | MSRP | $329.00 |
| Radeon Pro Navi | Generation | GeForce 900 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 205 W | Power Consumption | 148 W |
| Memory | ||
8 GB | Memory Size | 4 GB |
| GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 256-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
448 GB/s | Bandwidth | 224.4 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
120.3 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 65.97 GPixel/s |
270.7 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 122.5 GTexel/s |
8.663 TFLOPS | FP32 | 3.92 TFLOPS |
