The Radeon Pro Duo is a slower gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon Pro Duo
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is better in every way
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- A much faster GPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 66% less energy – 120 vs 350 Watts
- Up to 50% more VRAM memory – 6 vs 4 GB
Radeon Pro Duo vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon Pro Duo
Apr 26th, 2016
Average FPS
74
89%
Min 1% FPS
38
86%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Feb 22nd, 2019
Average FPS
83
100%
Min 1% FPS
44
100%
Price, $
$410
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.93/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
$410.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$179.95
In Stock
Radeon Pro Duo vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon Pro Duo vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon Pro Duo vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon Pro Duo
Apr 26th, 2016
Memory
4 GB
67%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
64 GPixel/s
75%
Texture Fillrate
256 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
8.192 TFLOPS
100%
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Feb 22nd, 2019
Memory
6 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
288 GB/s
56%
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
66%
FP32
5.437 TFLOPS
66%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon Pro Duo | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Apr 26th, 2016 | Release Date | Feb 22nd, 2019 |
$1,499.00 | MSRP | $279.00 |
Radeon Pro GCN | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
350 W | Power Consumption | 120 W |
Memory | ||
4 GB | Memory Size | 6 GB |
HBM | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
4096-bit | Memory Bus | 192-bit |
512 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
64 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 84.96 GPixel/s |
256 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 169.9 GTexel/s |
8.192 TFLOPS | FP32 | 5.437 TFLOPS |