Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1660 Ti outperforms Radeon Pro 5500M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both GPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is 264 days older than Radeon Pro 5500M.
Advantages of Radeon Pro 5500M
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - 85 vs 120 Watts
- Up to 33% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - 8 vs 6 GB
Advantages of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- Performs up to 100% better in Overwatch 2 than Radeon Pro 5500M - 132 vs 66 FPS
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
FPS
132
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.02/FPS
100%
Price, $
$399
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $399 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 210 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • Nov 13th, 2019
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Mobile • Nov 13th, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
46.4 GPixel/s
55%
Texel Fillrate
139.2 GTexel/s
82%
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
100%
Radeon Pro 5500M | vs | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
---|---|---|
Nov 13th, 2019 | Release Date | Feb 22nd, 2019 |
Radeon Pro Mac | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Not Available | MSRP | $279 |
None | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
8 GB | Memory | 6 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 192-bit |
192 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
1000 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
1450 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1770 MHz |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |