The Radeon Pro 460 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon Pro 460
- Consumes up to 88% less energy – 35 vs 285 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 4 GB
Radeon Pro 460 vs GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon Pro 460
Oct 30th, 2016
Average FPS
48
26%
Min 1% FPS
21
18%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
182
100%
Min 1% FPS
114
100%
Price, $
$1192.85
100%
Value, $/FPS
$6.55/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
$1,192.85
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$1,249.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$1,137.64
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$1,343.06
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$1,299.97
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$1,330.00
In Stock
Radeon Pro 460 vs GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon Pro 460 vs GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon Pro 460 vs GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon Pro 460
Oct 30th, 2016
Memory
4 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
81.28 GB/s
12%
Pixel Fillrate
14.51 GPixel/s
6%
Texture Fillrate
58.05 GTexel/s
8%
FP32
1.858 TFLOPS
4%
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
Jan 8th, 2024
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
672.3 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
250.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
689 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
44.1 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon Pro 460 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 30th, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $799.00 |
| Radeon Pro Mac | Generation | GeForce 40 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
35 W | Power Consumption | 285 W |
| Memory | ||
| 4 GB | Memory Size | 16 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6X |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 81.28 GB/s | Bandwidth | 672.3 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 14.51 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 250.6 GPixel/s |
| 58.05 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 689 GTexel/s |
| 1.858 TFLOPS | FP32 | 44.1 TFLOPS |
