The Radeon Pro 460 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon Pro 460
- Consumes up to 71% less energy – 35 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 50% more VRAM memory – 6 vs 4 GB
Radeon Pro 460 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon Pro 460
Oct 30th, 2016
Average FPS
48
58%
Min 1% FPS
21
48%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Feb 22nd, 2019
Average FPS
83
100%
Min 1% FPS
44
100%
Price, $
$349.22
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.2/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
$349.22
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$349.99
In Stock
Radeon Pro 460 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon Pro 460 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon Pro 460 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon Pro 460
Oct 30th, 2016
Memory
4 GB
67%
Memory Bandwidth
81.28 GB/s
28%
Pixel Fillrate
14.51 GPixel/s
17%
Texture Fillrate
58.05 GTexel/s
34%
FP32
1.858 TFLOPS
34%
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Feb 22nd, 2019
Memory
6 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
288 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
5.437 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon Pro 460 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 30th, 2016 | Release Date | Feb 22nd, 2019 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $279.00 |
| Radeon Pro Mac | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
35 W | Power Consumption | 120 W |
| Memory | ||
| 4 GB | Memory Size | 6 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 192-bit |
| 81.28 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 14.51 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 84.96 GPixel/s |
| 58.05 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 169.9 GTexel/s |
| 1.858 TFLOPS | FP32 | 5.437 TFLOPS |
