The Radeon HD 7950 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon HD 7950
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is better in every way
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 40% less energy – 120 vs 200 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 6 vs 3 GB
Radeon HD 7950 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon HD 7950
Jan 31st, 2012
Average FPS
53
64%
Min 1% FPS
24
55%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Feb 22nd, 2019
Average FPS
83
100%
Min 1% FPS
44
100%
Price, $
$349.22
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.2/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
$349.22
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$423.74
In Stock
Radeon HD 7950 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon HD 7950 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon HD 7950 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon HD 7950
Jan 31st, 2012
Memory
3 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
240 GB/s
83%
Pixel Fillrate
25.6 GPixel/s
30%
Texture Fillrate
89.6 GTexel/s
53%
FP32
2.867 TFLOPS
53%
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Feb 22nd, 2019
Memory
6 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
288 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
5.437 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon HD 7950 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 31st, 2012 | Release Date | Feb 22nd, 2019 |
| $449.00 | MSRP | $279.00 |
| Southern Islands | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 200 W | Power Consumption | 120 W |
| Memory | ||
| 3 GB | Memory Size | 6 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 384-bit | Memory Bus | 192-bit |
| 240 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 25.6 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 84.96 GPixel/s |
| 89.6 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 169.9 GTexel/s |
| 2.867 TFLOPS | FP32 | 5.437 TFLOPS |
