Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 295X2 outperforms GeForce MX450 25W on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 295X2 is 2300 days older than GeForce MX450 25W.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce MX450 25W
- Consumes up to 95% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 295X2 - 25 vs 500 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 295X2
- Performs up to 5% better in Lost Ark than GeForce MX450 25W - 179 vs 170 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce MX450 25W - 4 vs 2 GB
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
GeForce MX450 25W
Mobile • Aug 15th, 2020
Radeon R9 295X2
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
GeForce MX450 25W
Mobile • Aug 15th, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
29.76 GPixel/s
45%
Texel Fillrate
52.08 GTexel/s
29%
Radeon R9 295X2
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
65.15 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
179.2 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce MX450 25W | vs | AMD Radeon R9 295X2 |
|---|---|---|
Aug 15th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2014 |
| GeForce MX | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $1499 |
| None | Outputs | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 3x 8-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
| GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 64-bit | Bus | 512-bit |
| 80 GB/s | Bandwidth | 320 GB/s |
| 720 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1018 MHz |
| 930 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
| 1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1250 MHz |
