Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER outperforms the cheaper Radeon R7 250 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Radeon R7 250 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER is 2212 days newer than the cheaper Radeon R7 250.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
- Performs up to 12% better in War Thunder than Radeon R7 250 - 233 vs 208 FPS
- Up to 500% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R7 250 - 6 vs 1 GB
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 250
- Up to 93% cheaper than GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER - $29.99 vs $399.99
- Up to 92% better value when playing War Thunder than GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER - $0.14 vs $1.72 per FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER - 55 vs 125 Watts
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Oct 29th, 2019
FPS
233
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.72/FPS
8%
Price, $
$399.99
7%
FPS Winner
Buy for $399.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8253 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
FPS
208
89%
Value, $/FPS
$0.14/FPS
100%
Price, $
$29.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $29.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8254 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Oct 29th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Oct 29th, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
85.68 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
157.1 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | vs | AMD Radeon R7 250 |
---|---|---|
Oct 29th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 8th, 2013 |
GeForce 16 | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
$229 | MSRP | Not Available |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 GB | Memory | 1 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | DDR3 |
192-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
336 GB/s | Bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s |
1530 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 925 MHz |
1785 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1750 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 900 MHz |