Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER outperforms the cheaper Radeon R7 240 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Radeon R7 240 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER is 2212 days newer than the cheaper Radeon R7 240.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
- Performs up to 40% better in Ready or Not than Radeon R7 240 - 120 vs 86 FPS
- Up to 200% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R7 240 - 6 vs 2 GB
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 240
- Up to 84% cheaper than GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER - $29.72 vs $189.99
- Up to 78% better value when playing Ready or Not than GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER - $0.35 vs $1.58 per FPS
- Consumes up to 76% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER - 30 vs 125 Watts
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 29th, 2019
FPS
120
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.58/FPS
22%
Price, $
$189.99
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for $189.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
FPS
86
71%
Value, $/FPS
$0.35/FPS
100%
Price, $
$29.72
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $29.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 29th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Oct 29th, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
85.68 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
157.1 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | vs | AMD Radeon R7 240 |
---|---|---|
Oct 29th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 8th, 2013 |
GeForce 16 | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
$229 | MSRP | $69 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
192-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
336 GB/s | Bandwidth | 73.6 GB/s |
1530 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 650 MHz |
1785 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 700 MHz |
1750 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1150 MHz |