Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 290X outperforms the cheaper GeForce GTX 1650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 290X is 2007 days older than the cheaper GeForce GTX 1650.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- Up to 29% cheaper than Radeon R9 290X - $149.99 vs $210.0
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 290X - 75 vs 290 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 290X
- Performs up to 5% better in Monster Hunter: World than GeForce GTX 1650 - 77 vs 73 FPS
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $149.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77173 minutes ago
Buy for $210 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77174 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
83.25%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
52.97727272727273%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 290X |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 24th, 2013 |
GeForce 16 | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
$149 | MSRP | $549 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 512-bit |
128.1 GB/s | Bandwidth | 320 GB/s |
1485 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
1665 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
2001 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1250 MHz |