Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 290X outperforms the cheaper GeForce GTX 750 Ti on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing GeForce GTX 750 Ti is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Radeon R9 290X is 117 days older than the cheaper GeForce GTX 750 Ti.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 290X
- Performs up to 38% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than GeForce GTX 750 Ti - 54 vs 39 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti - 4 vs 2 GB
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
- Up to 48% cheaper than Radeon R9 290X - $109.0 vs $210.0
- Up to 28% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Radeon R9 290X - $2.79 vs $3.89 per FPS
- Consumes up to 79% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 290X - 60 vs 290 Watts
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $210 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13480 minutes ago
Desktop • Feb 18th, 2014
FPS
39
72%
Value, $/FPS
$2.79/FPS
100%
Price, $
$109
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $109 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13697 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2013
Desktop • Feb 18th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Feb 18th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
17.36 GPixel/s
27%
Texel Fillrate
43.4 GTexel/s
24%
AMD Radeon R9 290X | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti |
---|---|---|
Oct 24th, 2013 | Release Date | Feb 18th, 2014 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 700 |
$549 | MSRP | $149 |
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
512-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
320 GB/s | Bandwidth | 86.4 GB/s |
1000 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1020 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1085 MHz |
1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1350 MHz |