Key Differences
In short — Arc A750 outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Arc A750 is 902 days newer than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
- Consumes up to 78% less energy than Intel Arc A750 - 50 vs 225 Watts
Advantages of Intel Arc A750
- Performs up to 53% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile - 89 vs 58 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile - 8 vs 4 GB
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
FPS
89
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.7/FPS
100%
Price, $
$239.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $239.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 37 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • Apr 23rd, 2020
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
Mobile • Apr 23rd, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
47.52 GPixel/s
17%
Texel Fillrate
95.04 GTexel/s
17%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile | vs | Intel Arc A750 |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2022 |
GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | Alchemist |
Not Available | MSRP | $289 |
None | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0 |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
192 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
1350 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2050 MHz |
1485 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 2400 MHz |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2000 MHz |