Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile outperforms Radeon Pro WX 5100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 1252 days newer than Radeon Pro WX 5100.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
- Performs up to 32% better in Stray than Radeon Pro WX 5100 - 62 vs 47 FPS
- Consumes up to 33% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 - 50 vs 75 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile - 8 vs 4 GB
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Nov 18th, 2016
FPS
47
75%
Value, $/FPS
$4.45/FPS
100%
Price, $
$208.96
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $208.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 201 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Apr 23rd, 2020
Desktop • Nov 18th, 2016
Theoretical Performance
Mobile • Apr 23rd, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
47.52 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
95.04 GTexel/s
78%
Desktop • Nov 18th, 2016
Pixel Fillrate
34.75 GPixel/s
73%
Texel Fillrate
121.6 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile | vs | AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2020 | Release Date | Nov 18th, 2016 |
GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | Radeon Pro |
Not Available | MSRP | $499 |
None | Outputs | 4x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
192 GB/s | Bandwidth | 160 GB/s |
1350 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 713 MHz |
1485 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1086 MHz |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1250 MHz |