Key Differences
In short — Radeon RX Vega 64 outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon RX Vega 64 is 990 days older than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
- Consumes up to 83% less energy than AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 - 50 vs 295 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
- Performs up to 1% better in League of Legends than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile - 371 vs 368 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile - 8 vs 4 GB
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Aug 7th, 2017
FPS
371
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.35/FPS
100%
Price, $
$499
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $499 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 56 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Apr 23rd, 2020
Desktop • Aug 7th, 2017
Theoretical Performance
Mobile • Apr 23rd, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
47.52 GPixel/s
48%
Texel Fillrate
95.04 GTexel/s
24%
Desktop • Aug 7th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
98.94 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
395.8 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile | vs | AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2020 | Release Date | Aug 7th, 2017 |
GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | Vega |
Not Available | MSRP | $499 |
None | Outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 2x 8-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | HBM2 |
128-bit | Bus | 2048-bit |
192 GB/s | Bandwidth | 483.8 GB/s |
1350 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1247 MHz |
1485 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1546 MHz |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 945 MHz |