Key Differences
In short — Radeon PRO W7600 outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon PRO W7600 is 1197 days newer than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than AMD Radeon PRO W7600 - 50 vs 130 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon PRO W7600
- Performs up to 26% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile - 83 vs 66 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile - 8 vs 4 GB
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 3rd, 2023
FPS
83
100%
Value, $/FPS
$6.98/FPS
100%
Price, $
$579
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $579 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13568 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Apr 23rd, 2020
Desktop • Aug 3rd, 2023
Theoretical Performance
Mobile • Apr 23rd, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
47.52 GPixel/s
30%
Texel Fillrate
95.04 GTexel/s
30%
Desktop • Aug 3rd, 2023
Pixel Fillrate
156.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
312.3 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile | vs | AMD Radeon PRO W7600 |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2020 | Release Date | Aug 3rd, 2023 |
GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | Radeon Pro Navi |
Not Available | MSRP | $599 |
None | Outputs | 4x DisplayPort 2.1 |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
192 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
1350 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1720 MHz |
1485 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 2440 MHz |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2250 MHz |