Key Differences
In short — GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB outperforms the more expensive Radeon PRO W7600 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is 77 days older than the more expensive Radeon PRO W7600.
Advantages of AMD Radeon PRO W7600
- Consumes up to 21% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB - 130 vs 165 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
- Performs up to 17% better in No Man's Sky than Radeon PRO W7600 - 159 vs 136 FPS
- Up to 18% cheaper than Radeon PRO W7600 - $449.99 vs $550.0
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon PRO W7600 - 16 vs 8 GB
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $550 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77043 minutes ago
Desktop • May 18th, 2023
FPS
159
100%
Value, $/FPS
Price, $
$449.99
100%
FPS Winner
Buy for $449.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77043 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 3rd, 2023
Desktop • May 18th, 2023
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Aug 3rd, 2023
Pixel Fillrate
156.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
312.3 GTexel/s
90.57424593967518%
Desktop • May 18th, 2023
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
77.91293213828426%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon PRO W7600 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB |
---|---|---|
Aug 3rd, 2023 | Release Date | May 18th, 2023 |
Radeon Pro Navi | Generation | GeForce 40 |
$599 | MSRP | $499 |
4x DisplayPort 2.1 | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
1x 6-pin | Power Connectors | 1x 16-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 GB | Memory | 16 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
288 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
1720 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2310 MHz |
2440 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 2535 MHz |
2250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2250 MHz |