Key Differences
In short — Radeon PRO W7600 outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon PRO W7600 is 1218 days newer than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than AMD Radeon PRO W7600 - 50 vs 130 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon PRO W7600
- Performs up to 21% better in Far Cry 3 than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - 175 vs 145 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - 8 vs 4 GB
Far Cry 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 3rd, 2023
FPS
175
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.31/FPS
100%
Price, $
$579
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $579 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7676 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2020
Desktop • Aug 3rd, 2023
Theoretical Performance
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
38.4 GPixel/s
24%
Texel Fillrate
76.8 GTexel/s
24%
Desktop • Aug 3rd, 2023
Pixel Fillrate
156.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
312.3 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | vs | AMD Radeon PRO W7600 |
---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2020 | Release Date | Aug 3rd, 2023 |
GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | Radeon Pro Navi |
Not Available | MSRP | $599 |
None | Outputs | 4x DisplayPort 2.1 |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
160 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
1035 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1720 MHz |
1200 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 2440 MHz |
1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2250 MHz |