Key Differences
In short — Radeon RX Vega 64 outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon RX Vega 64 is 982 days older than GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
- Consumes up to 83% less energy than AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 - 50 vs 295 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
- Performs up to 9% better in F1 23 than GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile - 188 vs 173 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile - 8 vs 4 GB
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Aug 7th, 2017
FPS
188
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.65/FPS
100%
Price, $
$499
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $499 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 218 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mobile • Apr 15th, 2020
Desktop • Aug 7th, 2017
Theoretical Performance
Mobile • Apr 15th, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
48.48 GPixel/s
48%
Texel Fillrate
96.96 GTexel/s
24%
Desktop • Aug 7th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
98.94 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
395.8 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | vs | AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 |
---|---|---|
Apr 15th, 2020 | Release Date | Aug 7th, 2017 |
GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | Vega |
Not Available | MSRP | $499 |
None | Outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 2x 8-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | HBM2 |
128-bit | Bus | 2048-bit |
192 GB/s | Bandwidth | 483.8 GB/s |
1380 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1247 MHz |
1515 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1546 MHz |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 945 MHz |