Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1050 outperforms the cheaper Radeon Pro WX 3200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Radeon Pro WX 3200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing GeForce GTX 1050 is 980 days older than the cheaper Radeon Pro WX 3200.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050
- Performs up to 10% better in F1 22 than Radeon Pro WX 3200 - 54 vs 49 FPS
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
- Up to 17% cheaper than GeForce GTX 1050 - $138.29 vs $165.95
- Up to 8% better value when playing F1 22 than GeForce GTX 1050 - $2.82 vs $3.07 per FPS
- Consumes up to 13% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 - 65 vs 75 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 - 4 vs 2 GB
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
FPS
54
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.07/FPS
91%
Price, $
$165.95
83%
FPS Winner
Buy for $165.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2772 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
FPS
49
90%
Value, $/FPS
$2.82/FPS
100%
Price, $
$138.29
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $138.29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2772 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Pixel Fillrate
46.56 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
58.2 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
20.72 GPixel/s
44%
Texel Fillrate
41.44 GTexel/s
71%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 | vs | AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 |
---|---|---|
Oct 25th, 2016 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2019 |
GeForce 10 | Generation | Radeon Pro |
$109 | MSRP | $199 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
112.1 GB/s | Bandwidth | 96 GB/s |
1354 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1295 MHz |
1455 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1752 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |